bug#45198: 28.0.50; Sandbox mode

[Stefan Monnier]

>> I must say I don't know what's being discussed here.
>> What autoloads?  Why do we care?
> If a user looks at elisp code that depends on autoloads and the checker
> process cannot load those for reasons of sandbox policy or whatnot, there
> will be false positives about missing functions. This is fine if we are
> phasing out autoloads but as far as I know we're not.

I don't understand why it would be different for autoloads than for
functions provided by `require`d packages.

Also, if we add all the dirs in `load-path` to the set of readable
directories (and I do think we want to do that) this should not be
an issue, right?


        Stefan