bug#47425: 26.3; `plist-get', `plist-put' should accept a TEST function

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Philipp <p.stephani2@gmail.com> writes:

> I'm not a fan of this since it would mean that these functions will no
> longer be side-effect-free.  Adding a function argument to a function
> means that the function can no longer really promise anything, so it
> leads to code that's harder to reason about.

`plist-put' already mutates state (of the plist), so it's not
side-effect-free...

The other ones are, though.  But...  I'm not sure that's really much of
a concern in practice.  (And Emacs should be able to reason about the
function, still, if the predicate passed in is side effect free, but I
guess we don't have the machinery for that in place?)

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no