bug#50256: thing-at-mouse

[Juri Linkov]

>>  > Thanks, but is that the best fix?  It would mean any other Lisp
>>  > program that needs to do something similar will have to use such
>>  > kludges.
>>  >
>>  > But if I'm the only one who thinks this isn't clean enough, I won't
>>  > object to this solution.  Just be sure to add comments explaining why
>>  > you do something as strange as that.
>>
>> Please explain why you think Juri's solution is a kludge and why it is
>> not clean.
>
> Because it extremely non-obvious why the code does something strange
> like that.

I see no other way to fix it.