[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#39992: Merge external idlwave development efforts into GNU Emacs?
From: |
JD Smith |
Subject: |
bug#39992: Merge external idlwave development efforts into GNU Emacs? |
Date: |
Sun, 19 Sep 2021 12:41:12 -0400 |
I’m happy for anyone to work on merging the latest IDLWAVE into Emacs, and I
can assist with this process as time allows. This might require some moderate
effort, since I believe I refactored and simplified the code layout (in an
attempt to attract a new maintainer) after my last push into emacs core. This
refactoring occurred around 20015/16. My last commit on GitHub was actually in
2018.
I’ve also discussed with several of the emacs devels over the years moving
IDLWAVE to a package on Elpa. I think that’s a more appropriate home, since
there are not terribly many users (as judged by the number of email queries I
get now vs. a decade ago).
I still use IDLWAVE, but far more rarely than before. There is currently a bug
related to routine info scanning that I need to look into. I’m happy to do
this in the context of a merged core/elpa package if someone is able to lead
that effort. There were numerous changes on the emacs side based on obsoleted
functions, etc. that I never found the time to bring over.
And needless to say, if you know of any users of IDLWAVE who are interested in
taking over maintenance and overseeing its re-folding back into the emacs
core/elpa, I’d be delighted to speak with them.
Best,
JDS
> On Sep 19, 2021, at 12:05 PM, Stefan Kangas <stefan@marxist.se> wrote:
>
> Stefan Kangas <stefan@marxist.se> writes:
>
>> Stefan Kangas <stefan@marxist.se> writes:
>>
>>> I don't use it myself, but I noticed that there is ongoing development
>>> of idlwave.el here:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/jdtsmith/idlwave
>>>
>>> As far as I can tell from the git log, the last change to idlwave by
>>> JD Smith was on Fri Apr 27 19:34:22 2007 +0000.
>>>
>>> Would it be possible to merge this effort into the version distributed
>>> with GNU Emacs itself? That way more users could benefit from the
>>> improvements.
>>
>> I note that on the GitHub page, there has since been added a note:
>>
>> Note: IDLWAVE is currently not maintained. In current form it
>> supports IDL v8.6, and is still in daily use by some users.
>>
>> If you are interested in taking over IDLWAVE maintenance, please
>> post an issue. See the DEVELOP file for information on the file
>> structure layout.
>>
>> I'm not sure what this means for the idlwave we ship with Emacs.
>>
>> JD Smith, do you mind if someone else tries to on merge your external
>> development efforts into Emacs itself?
>
> The above email bounced, so I have now copied in the email address used
> in the GitHub repository.