[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#9622: [PATCH] Re: bug#9622: 23.3; flet indentation
From: |
akater |
Subject: |
bug#9622: [PATCH] Re: bug#9622: 23.3; flet indentation |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Sep 2021 18:12:10 +0000 |
Several fixes:
- We now check whether we're in the relevant subexpression of flet and
friends.
- Added -p to the predicate's name.
- Added cl-macrolet cl-flet* cl-symbol-macrolet to the list of local
definers. I added cl-symbol-macrolet too because this is how SLIME
indents symbol-macrolet.
Technical notes:
- I attached flet-tests.sexp which only contains cl-flet forms written
the way they are meant to be indented. I think writing them in
strings in deftest forms would be quite ugly and unreliable. If
appropriate, I could add test(s) that would try to indent individual
forms in the file; no change indicates test(s) passed. Only I'm not
sure what would be the best way to define an individual ert test per
form but I guess I'll figure it out. OK?
- parse-partial-sexp does not keep any record of relative position of
subexpressions in superexpressions which I found surprising. Things
would be easier if it did. Other things might become easier too.
But I did not dare to patch it.
I also have stylistic notes. First, the less important ones.
- You changed “iff” to “if”; I meant “iff”, i.e. “if and only if”; I
now changed it to “when” simply because the semantics corresponds
directly to that of lisp's own lingo and is thus in my opinion
easier to read.
- Lines
> In Wishful Lisp, the following form would be
> ...
are supposed to convey the intent of what the form in quistion does,
in a concise way. Feel free to remove this if you feel it doesn't
help.
The more involved stylistic note is
- a line split issue that I wanted to discuss for some time. See the
diff when it comes to second-order-parent and (pop parents). TL;DR:
it's entirely up to you but I wanted to point out that this was done
deliberately. Note that if pop (or a hypothetical cdrf) accepted
multiple arguments, most people would agree it's fine to keep these
two on a single line; if you have time, see the discussion I started
in emacs-devel:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2021-09/msg02189.html
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
0001-Fixup-cl-flet-indentation.patch
Description: Fix cl-flet indentation
flet-tests.sexp
Description: Test cases
- bug#9622: [PATCH] Re: bug#9622: 23.3; flet indentation,
akater <=
- bug#9622: [PATCH] Re: bug#9622: 23.3; flet indentation, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/09/30
- bug#9622: [PATCH] Re: bug#9622: 23.3; flet indentation, Mattias Engdegård, 2021/09/30
- bug#9622: [PATCH] Re: bug#9622: 23.3; flet indentation, Basil L. Contovounesios, 2021/09/30
- bug#9622: [PATCH] Re: bug#9622: 23.3; flet indentation, Mattias Engdegård, 2021/09/30
- bug#9622: [PATCH] Re: bug#9622: 23.3; flet indentation, Basil L. Contovounesios, 2021/09/30
- bug#9622: [PATCH] Re: bug#9622: 23.3; flet indentation, Thierry Volpiatto, 2021/09/30
- bug#9622: [PATCH] Re: bug#9622: 23.3; flet indentation, akater, 2021/09/30
- bug#9622: [PATCH] Re: bug#9622: 23.3; flet indentation, Thierry Volpiatto, 2021/09/30