bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#51075: 29.0.50; Uninitialised variable warning in src/term.c


From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: bug#51075: 29.0.50; Uninitialised variable warning in src/term.c
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2021 16:01:58 +0300

> Cc: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>
> Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2021 12:18:14 +0100
> From:  "Basil L. Contovounesios" via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
>  the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
> 
> I'm currently seeing the following warning with GCC 10.3.0:
> 
> In file included from term.c:30:
> term.c: In function ‘encode_terminal_code’:
> lisp.h:1853:35: warning: ‘gstring’ may be used uninitialized in this function 
> [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
>  1853 |   return XVECTOR (array)->contents[idx];
>       |          ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~
> term.c:553:16: note: ‘gstring’ was declared here
>   553 |    Lisp_Object gstring;
>       |                ^~~~~~~

It's a bogus warning.  It might be worth reporting to the GCC folks
(unless GCC 11 already fixed that).

> Is
> 
>   cmp = composition_table[src->u.cmp.id];
> 
> indeed guaranteed to be non-NULL?

If it's ever NULL, the very next line will segfault:

              cmp = composition_table[src->u.cmp.id];
              required = cmp->glyph_len;

> If so, maybe gstring could be
> initialised as nil and then easserted as non-nil in the !cmp branch
> (eassuming cmp is non-NULL in the !src->u.cmp.automatic branch does not
> make the warning go away).  If not, could there indeed be a bug?

Feel free to assign some value to gstring in the 'else' clause, to
shut up GCC in this case.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]