bug#51037: [PATCH] Make `print-level` & `print-length` customizable in ERT batch tests

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Michael <sp1ff@runbox.com> writes:

> Good point. I simply carried the strategy over from that used to
> unit test `ert-run-tests-interactively`. TBH I was unaware of
> `cl-letf`, and there *is* this comment above
> `ert-run-tests-interactively`:
>
>    ;; Should OUTPUT-BUFFER-NAME and MESSAGE-FN really be     arguments
>      here?
>    ;; They are needed only for our automated self-tests at the
>       moment.
>    ;; Or should there be some other mechanism?
>
> Perhaps I should change *both* to just use `cl-letf`?

Sounds good to me.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no