bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#41572: 28.0.50; [PATCH] Support plain project marked with file .emac


From: Dmitry Gutov
Subject: bug#41572: 28.0.50; [PATCH] Support plain project marked with file .emacs-project
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 03:40:47 +0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0

On 10.10.2021 19:47, Juri Linkov wrote:
Then maybe the backend could be named 'project-file'
since a special file defines the project root.

That's a little more meaningful, though too close to
'project-files'. 'project-markered' or 'project-markerfile' would probably
be less ambiguous.

In 'project-filemarker' I misread "filemarker" as "filmmaker" :-)

Right. :-)

Another possible name would be "fileroot".

Also sounds more like a method than a project type name.

Maybe project-markered or project-marked, or project-dominated (along the lines of 'locate-dominating-file'?). Or something noncommittal like project-dirtee.

But all of those sounds like one could put them at any position in project-find-functions, which project-fallback explicitly discourages.

Suppose somebody puts it before 'vc' to use if for a purpose we did not
design it for: make sure that some subproject 'foo' in their monorepo is
considered a separate project. 'foo/Makefile' exists, so they add
"Makefile" to project-fallback-markers, and it kind of seems to work.

There are two contradictory needs:

1. When a marker list contains both ".dir-locals.el" and "Makefile",
    it should ignore Makefile files in vc-based project subdirs, e.g.
    emacs/lisp/Makefile, etc.

Right. That says project-try-fallback going after project-try-vc is a good thing.

2. OTOH, I often type 'C-x p g' to search all gems of the same
    ruby version in e.g. ~/.rbenv/versions/2.7.4/lib/ruby/gems
    But it finds ~/.rbenv/.git and tries to search all ruby versions.
    I could manually add .dir-locals.el only to a particular version's
    subdir.

I'm using this setup, FWIW:

  (defun project-try-gem (dir)
    (when (string-match "/\\.rbenv/versions/.*/gems/.*/gems/[^/]+/" dir)
      (cons 'rubygem
            (substring dir 0 (match-end 0)))))

  (cl-defmethod project-root ((project (head rubygem)))
    (cdr project))

  (with-eval-after-load 'project
    (add-hook 'project-find-functions #'project-try-gem))

Which avoids the whole directory-walking routine, probably saving on a number of CPU cycles.

But how to override ~/.rbenv/.git?  Maybe by changing
    the order of backends in project-find-functions?
    Then the fallback won't be the last backend anymore.
    Also the backend priorities will be changed globally
    for all other projects, and 'C-x p g' in emacs/lisp
    will find emacs/lisp/Makefile to override emacs/.git.

If we keep the same tool to ensure the priorities (order of functions in project-try-vc), that would seem like we should use two different backends for these two different purposes.

Say, the first one would be called project-dominating, and the other one - still project-fallback.

project-find-functions will be

  '(project-try-dominating project-try-vc project-try-fallback

Alternatively, one backend could combine these, but it would have, like, configurable logic with two different sets of predicates -- one universal (whether the file is inside a VCS repo or not), and another for when the file is strictly outside of VCS repos. But that sounds trickier, both to configure and to understand. Also, it seems like with this approach the backend *should* ignore the .gitignore entires, which is fine for .rbenv/versions/.*/gems, but it's bound not to work for some other purposes some users are going to try to use it for.

So, since I don't know of any other use cases for the project-dominating code path rather than Ruby gems inside ~/.rbenv, I figured not to try to solve this use case yet. But we can catalogue similar use cases (maybe other versions switchers, for Ruby and other languages?; not sure if installed libraries for other languages also fit this approach) and add another backend for them later. Help welcome, of course.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]