bug#50660: 28.0.50; Text artifacting when the cursor moves over text under mouse face that originally displayed a box

[Po Lu]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

> We may be miscommunicating.  My point is that the conditions on which
> you base the face selection are known in draw_glyphs, so why delay
> that to when xterm.c is called to actually draw the glyph string?  Why
> not test this same condition in draw_glyphs (or some other suitable
> place in xdisp.c) and fix the glyph string's face accordingly?  Am I
> missing something?

OK, I think I understand what you mean now.  But is it really correct to
put that in draw_glyphs, and not say, fill_XXX_glyph_string?  And even
then, what about cases where a non-ASCII face is used?  Does the mouse
face in the Mouse_HLInfo take that into account?

Thanks.