bug#51340: [External] : Re: bug#51340: 27.2; Bad indentation and fontification of advice functions

[Drew Adams]

> > 1. Please consider indenting functions such as `advice-add' and
> >    `add-function' properly.  They should probably be indented the way
> >    function definitions (defuns) are.  So far, they're indented with
> >    no attention to what they're for or what their content is (e.g.
> >    use of keywords).
> 
> Do you have an example of the current indentation, and the one you
> would like to see?  Thanks.

I don't really care much.  Mainly wanted to draw some
attention to the (minor) "problem", which could use
some love.

(advice-add 
 'foobar-mode :around 'my-foobar-around-advice)

(advice-add 'foobar-mode 
            :around 'my-foobar-around-advice)

(advice-add 'foobar-mode :around
 'my-foobar-around-advice)

(add-function :before-until (local 'something)
              #'some-function)

(add-function where isearch-filter-predicate pred
              (append (and (or name  ...)
                           `((name . ...)))
                      (and ...
                           (or ...)
                           (let ((foo  ...))
                             (unless (or ...)
                               (setq foo  ))
                             (and ...)))))

Maybe just indent as we do for `defun'.  Regardless
of where the first line is ended, just indent 1 char.

(defun foo
 () "jjj" (xyz))

(defun foo ()
 "jjj" (xyz))

(defun foo () "jjj"
 (xyz))

But as I say, I don't have any particular idea about
what the indentation should be, other than that what
we have now seems a bit odd, and wastes horizontal
space when you have a bunch of code (e.g. the last
add-function example above).