[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#54914: 28.1.50; Unable to form Brahmi conjuncts in Emacs
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#54914: 28.1.50; Unable to form Brahmi conjuncts in Emacs |
Date: |
Sat, 16 Apr 2022 13:22:07 +0300 |
> From: Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com>
> Cc: 54914@debbugs.gnu.org, lumarzeli30@gmail.com
> Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 11:07:23 +0200
>
> >>>>> On Wed, 13 Apr 2022 21:26:55 +0300, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> said:
>
> >> From: Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com>
> >> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, 54914@debbugs.gnu.org
> >> Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 18:56:21 +0200
> >>
> >> A brute-force example of what Eli's talking about would be:
> >>
> >> (set-char-table-range composition-function-table
> >> '(#x11000 . #x1107F)
> >> (list (vector "[\x11000-\x1107F]+" 0 #'font-shape-gstring)))
>
> Eli> Does that really work? I'm not sure it will catch the "consonant,
> Eli> virama, consonant" rule (because the virama is a nonspacing mark, and
> Eli> we have a default rule for those in composite.el).
>
> We do indeed. The following handles only Ka through Lla in combination
> with Virama, and seems to do the right thing here with Segoe UI
> Historic (which I donʼt think we can set as default for the Brahmi
> script, since itʼs non-free).
>
> ;; <Consonant, Virama, Consonant>, or <Consonant, Virama>, where the
> ;; latter indicates a vowelless consonant.
> (set-char-table-range composition-function-table
> '(#x11013 . #x11034)
> (list (vector "[\x11013-\x11034]\x11046[\x11013-\x11034]?"
> 0 #'font-shape-gstring)))
I've now added support for the Brahmi script to the master branch;
please test and report any problems you find.
(We cannot advertise Segoe UI Historic, unfortunately, since it is not
a free font, AFAICT.)
- bug#54914: 28.1.50; Unable to form Brahmi conjuncts in Emacs, Sameer Singh, 2022/04/13
- bug#54914: 28.1.50; Unable to form Brahmi conjuncts in Emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/04/13
- bug#54914: 28.1.50; Unable to form Brahmi conjuncts in Emacs, Robert Pluim, 2022/04/13
- bug#54914: 28.1.50; Unable to form Brahmi conjuncts in Emacs, समीर सिंह Sameer Singh, 2022/04/13
- bug#54914: 28.1.50; Unable to form Brahmi conjuncts in Emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/04/13
- bug#54914: 28.1.50; Unable to form Brahmi conjuncts in Emacs, Robert Pluim, 2022/04/14
- bug#54914: 28.1.50; Unable to form Brahmi conjuncts in Emacs,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#54914: 28.1.50; Unable to form Brahmi conjuncts in Emacs, समीर सिंह Sameer Singh, 2022/04/16
- bug#54914: 28.1.50; Unable to form Brahmi conjuncts in Emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/04/16
- bug#54914: 28.1.50; Unable to form Brahmi conjuncts in Emacs, समीर सिंह Sameer Singh, 2022/04/16
- bug#54914: 28.1.50; Unable to form Brahmi conjuncts in Emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/04/16
- bug#54914: 28.1.50; Unable to form Brahmi conjuncts in Emacs, समीर सिंह Sameer Singh, 2022/04/17
- bug#54914: 28.1.50; Unable to form Brahmi conjuncts in Emacs, Robert Pluim, 2022/04/17
- bug#54914: 28.1.50; Unable to form Brahmi conjuncts in Emacs, समीर सिंह Sameer Singh, 2022/04/17
- bug#54914: 28.1.50; Unable to form Brahmi conjuncts in Emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/04/17
- bug#54914: 28.1.50; Unable to form Brahmi conjuncts in Emacs, समीर सिंह Sameer Singh, 2022/04/17
- bug#54914: 28.1.50; Unable to form Brahmi conjuncts in Emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/04/17