[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#55149: 29.0.50; Commit f30625943e broke magit/with-editor
From: |
Tassilo Horn |
Subject: |
bug#55149: 29.0.50; Commit f30625943e broke magit/with-editor |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Apr 2022 09:31:22 +0200 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.7.13; emacs 29.0.50 |
Juri Linkov <juri@linkov.net> writes:
>>> The regression is that the return value of :after now overrides
>>> the return value of the original function.
>>
>> Oh, indeed. But isn't that exactly as documented for add-function?
>>
>> :after (lambda (&rest r) (apply OLDFUN r) (apply FUNCTION r))
>
> Indeed, it seems documentation differed from the actual implementation.
>
>> Of course, we'd rather want
>>
>> :after (lambda (&rest r) (prog1 (apply OLDFUN r) (apply FUNCTION r)))
>
> Yep, this looks like what it's natural to expect from such advice type.
> Or maybe a new type could be added to modify the return value?
There is :filter-return to do exactly that.
Bye,
Tassilo
- bug#55149: 29.0.50; Commit f30625943e broke magit/with-editor, Tassilo Horn, 2022/04/27
- bug#55149: 29.0.50; Commit f30625943e broke magit/with-editor, Stefan Monnier, 2022/04/28
- bug#55149: 29.0.50; Commit f30625943e broke magit/with-editor, Tassilo Horn, 2022/04/28
- bug#55149: 29.0.50; Commit f30625943e broke magit/with-editor, Stefan Monnier, 2022/04/28
- bug#55149: 29.0.50; Commit f30625943e broke magit/with-editor, Tassilo Horn, 2022/04/28
bug#55149: (No Subject), M. Ian Graham, 2022/04/28
bug#55149: 29.0.50; Commit f30625943e broke magit/with-editor, M. Ian Graham, 2022/04/28