[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#43866: 26.3; italian postfix additions
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#43866: 26.3; italian postfix additions |
Date: |
Sat, 30 Apr 2022 18:26:58 +0300 |
> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
> Cc: juri@linkov.net, rpluim@gmail.com, 43866@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2022 16:49:14 +0200
>
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
> > I'm okay with what you propose, but I don't see how would that
> > eliminate the reasons for my worries. The implementation of the
> > effect of this argument is still in print_object, so the question that
> > is of interest to me is how will we communicate these arguments to
> > print_object?
>
> I was thinking that prin1* would just set/bind a new global variable
> (but one that isn't visible to the Lisp level).
Then this sounds almost exactly like what I suggested back then, so I
agree, of course.