bug#36649: 27.0.50; pure space and pdumper

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com> writes:

>> The latter case is the reason why we cannot yet remove unexec.
>>
>> Is m68k a live platform, or is it also dying?
>
> It's still supported by at least one major GNU/Linux distribution, and
> there was recent activity on bug#44531, so it's still being used enough
> for users to complain when something goes wrong.

Which GNU/Linux distribution is that?

Anyway, I don't feel that carrying around unexec just for m68k is
warranted -- it's a super duper marginal platform, and probably isn't
used for real work by anybody.  (So they can use older Emacs versions if
they absolutely have to.)

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no