[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#56641: Deprecate `lsh`
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#56641: Deprecate `lsh` |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Jul 2022 18:40:38 +0300 |
> From: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 10:44:18 -0400
> Cc: 56641@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
> > The ELisp manual already says that ash is a better alternative, but
> > lsh has its niche,
>
> When would I want to use `lsh' over `ash'?
When you want the results that lsh gives you.
They don't yield the same results in all situations.
- bug#56641: Deprecate `lsh`, Mattias Engdegård, 2022/07/19
- bug#56641: Deprecate `lsh`, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/07/19
- bug#56641: Deprecate `lsh`, Stefan Kangas, 2022/07/19
- bug#56641: Deprecate `lsh`,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#56641: Deprecate `lsh`, Mattias Engdegård, 2022/07/19
- bug#56641: Deprecate `lsh`, Stefan Kangas, 2022/07/19
- bug#56641: Deprecate `lsh`, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/07/19
- bug#56641: Deprecate `lsh`, Po Lu, 2022/07/19
- bug#56641: Deprecate `lsh`, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/07/19
- bug#56641: Deprecate `lsh`, Po Lu, 2022/07/19
- bug#56641: Deprecate `lsh`, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/07/20
- bug#56641: Deprecate `lsh`, Mattias Engdegård, 2022/07/20
- bug#56641: Deprecate `lsh`, Po Lu, 2022/07/20
- bug#56641: Deprecate `lsh`, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/07/20