bug#56773: 29.0.50; (readablep UNREADABLE) causes strange things

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com> writes:

>> We need to switch back to the original buffer before that Ffuncall, but
>> we don't know what the original function was -- it's just stored in a
>> local variable in prin1(-to-string).
>
> Isn't that problem already present?  IOW, that function is still called
> in the internal buffer under the current code.

I'm not sure what you mean?  That's the problem I'm pointing out, and
asking for suggestions in how to fix.