|
From: | Damien Cassou |
Subject: | bug#56809: file-name-with-extension: Improve docstring. |
Date: | Thu, 28 Jul 2022 10:35:01 +0200 |
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes: > Looks OK? looks better than my version :-). The only thing I don't really like is > "Return FILENAME modified to… Most readers will know that FILENAME is not going to be modified but the phrasing is still confusing in my opinion. I would prefer a version around the word "concatenate" or similar. Here is another version: Concatenate FILENAME without its extension and EXTENSION. It doesn't say that the result of the concatenation is returned but I'm fine having it implied. Your call. -- Damien Cassou "Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without losing enthusiasm." --Winston Churchill
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |