[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#57693: 29.0.50; Is there a more reliable version of `char-displayabl
From: |
Ihor Radchenko |
Subject: |
bug#57693: 29.0.50; Is there a more reliable version of `char-displayable-p'? |
Date: |
Fri, 09 Sep 2022 21:25:35 +0800 |
Hello,
In Org, we have recently had a need to check if a Unicode character can
be displayed in buffer.
We used the following:
(...
(if (and (display-graphic-p)
(char-displayable-p ?⭠)
(char-displayable-p ?─))
"⭠ now ───────────────────────────────────────────────"
"now - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -")
...)
However, char-displayable-p returned false-positive for one user:
https://list.orgmode.org/orgmode/87mtddhprr.fsf@localhost/
False-positives are indeed not unexpected in char-displayable-p; just as
its docstring warns. However, I am now wondering if there is some more
accurate way to know if a character can be actually displayed on buffer
or not.
--
Ihor Radchenko,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at https://orgmode.org/.
Support Org development at https://liberapay.com/org-mode,
or support my work at https://liberapay.com/yantar92
- bug#57693: 29.0.50; Is there a more reliable version of `char-displayable-p'?,
Ihor Radchenko <=
bug#57693: 29.0.50; Is there a more reliable version of `char-displayable-p'?, Ihor Radchenko, 2022/09/10