[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#57792: 29.0.50; async-shell-command fails with prefix-argument on -m
From: |
Vladimir Nikishkin |
Subject: |
bug#57792: 29.0.50; async-shell-command fails with prefix-argument on -master |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Sep 2022 22:36:19 +0800 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.8.6; emacs 29.0.50 |
Maybe I am confusing it with C-u M-! , but for the async version would
do the same would make sense.
Vladimir Nikishkin <lockywolf@gmail.com> writes:
> Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:
>
>> Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> I can reproduce this bug on master, 27.1 and 28.2. Here's a test case
>>> (not tested):
>>>
>>> (ert-deftest simple-tests-async-shell-command-57792 ()
>>> "Test for https://debbugs.gnu.org/57792 ."
>>> (with-temp-buffer
>>> ;; Pretend we have a prefix argument.
>>> (async-shell-command "echo \"test\"" '(4))
>>> (should (equal (buffer-string) "test"))))
>>>
>>> I'm not sure what behavior we want here, though. Should we insert the
>>> command output directly at point in the current buffer, or should we
>>> first insert it into "*Async Shell Command*" and copy it over when done?
>>
>> The prefix isn't documented to do anything (and currently bugs out), so
>> perhaps we should just remove the prefix from the interactive spec
>> instead?
>
>> Is the intention that `C-u M-&' insert the output in the current buffer?
>
> I am quite sure it used to do that in the past. Perhaps, as late as
> 27.2. I can try to do a bisect to find when exactly this has changed.
> Moreover, it would be analogous to C-u M-: inserting the return value
> into the buffer at point.
--
Your sincerely,
Vladimir Nikishkin (MiEr, lockywolf)
(Laptop)