bug#58111: [PATCH] Add support for the Adlam script

From:

समीर सिंह Sameer Singh

Subject:

Date:

Tue, 27 Sep 2022 21:23:40 +0530

This doesn't look right: why 1 and not 0?

I copied this from my hanifi-rohingya composition rules, where I do not remember

why I added 0 instead of 1. Even though they were working as intended I have replaced it with 0

there just to be safe.

On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 6:46 PM Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:

> From: समीर सिंह Sameer Singh
> <lumarzeli30@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 16:52:22 +0530
>
> --- a/etc/NEWS
> +++ b/etc/NEWS
> @@ -1229,10 +1229,9 @@ to edit such sequences by allowing point to "enter" the sequence.
> *** Support for many old scripts and writing systems.
> Emacs now supports and has language-environments and input methods for
> several dozens of old scripts that were used in the past for various
> -languages in South and South-East Asia. For each such script Emacs
> -now has font-selection and character composition rules, a language
> -environment, and an input method. The newly-added scripts and the
> -corresponding language environments are:
> +languages. For each such script Emacs now has font-selection and character
> +composition rules, a language environment, and an input method. The newly-added
> +scripts and the corresponding language environments are:

The new text needs to be re-filled.

> +;; Adlam composition rules
> +(set-char-table-range
> + composition-function-table
> + '(#x1E900 . #x1E95F)
> + (list (vector
> + "[\x1E900-\x1E95F]+"
> + 1 'font-shape-gstring)))

This doesn't look right: why 1 and not 0?