bug#50507: New function in Emacs GnuTLS implementation

[Nikolaos Chatzikonstantinou]

On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 6:47 AM Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>
> > From: Nikolaos Chatzikonstantinou <nchatz314@gmail.com>
> > Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2022 06:04:30 -0400
> > Cc: 50507@debbugs.gnu.org, Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>, Eli 
> > Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 10:08 AM Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >>>>> On Thu, 29 Sep 2022 09:44:09 -0400, Nikolaos Chatzikonstantinou 
> > > >>>>> <nchatz314@gmail.com> said:
> > >     Nikolaos> +The :pass and :flags keys are ignored with old versions of 
> > > GnuTLS, and
> > >     Nikolaos> +:flags is ignored if :pass is not specified.
> > >     Nikolaos> +
> > >     >>
> > >     >> Maybe mention that not specifying :flags or passing :flags nil 
> > > means
> > >     >> passing '0' to the GnuTLS function?
> > >
> > >     Nikolaos> Yes, and on that note, I discovered two things. One, the 
> > > value 0 is
> > >     Nikolaos> special; it has meaning but it is not an enumeration 
> > > constant. I
> > >     Nikolaos> documented this appropriately. Two, the password may be 
> > > NULL instead
> > >     Nikolaos> of a string.
> > >
> > > OK. I guess youʼre mapping ':pass nil' to that?
> >
> > Yes.
> >
> > >     Nikolaos> +  DEFSYM (Qgnutls_pkcs_plain, "GNUTLS_PKCS_PLAIN");
> > >     Nikolaos> <removed a few more such lines>
> > >     Nikolaos> +  DEFSYM (Qgnutls_pkcs_pbes2_gost_cpd, 
> > > "GNUTLS_PKCS_PBES2_GOST_CPD");
> > >     >>
> > >     >> All this is kind of awkward, but apart from doing DEFVAR_LISP Iʼm 
> > > not
> > >     >> aware of how to define a lisp level symbol with a value (it would
> > >     >> allow you to simplify `key_file2_aux', since you could just extract
> > >     >> the values directly from the symbols).
> > >
> > >     Nikolaos> I am now comparing against intern("GNUTLS_PKCS_PLAIN") and 
> > > so on.
> > >
> > > I guess thatʼs another option, but itʼs not the preferred
> > > solution. Anyway, letʼs not let the perfect be the enemy of the good.
> >
> > I went with intern.
>
> Why not use DEFSYM and then compare against the static symbols?  That
> is more efficient, since the intern call is avoided at run time.

I did not understand the differences between DEFSYM() and
intern(). Can DEFSYM() be used outside of syms_of_gnutls()? In
particular can I (and, should I?) call it inside the key_file2_aux()
function?