[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#61893: 29.0.60; Indentation in c-ts-mode broken again
From: |
Theodor Thornhill |
Subject: |
bug#61893: 29.0.60; Indentation in c-ts-mode broken again |
Date: |
Sat, 04 Mar 2023 09:54:29 +0100 |
On 3 March 2023 23:01:39 CET, Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>> On Mar 2, 2023, at 10:07 PM, Theodor Thornhill <theo@thornhill.no> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 3 March 2023 05:07:44 CET, Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Mar 1, 2023, at 10:31 PM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> From: Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com>
>>>>> Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2023 14:08:23 -0800
>>>>> Cc: Daniel Martín <mardani29@yahoo.es>,
>>>>> Theodor Thornhill <theo@thornhill.no>,
>>>>> 61893@debbugs.gnu.org
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks. So I wasn't dreaming after all.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry about that. It should be fixed now.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, it's much better now.
>>>>
>>>> I spotted the following problems, not sure if they are new or not: go
>>>> to line 297 of dispnew.c, which is "#endif". Then type "C-e RET" --
>>>> point goes to column zero instead of the expected column 6. This
>>>> affects the following 3 lines as well; only the next 'if' fixes the
>>>> indentation. I see the same problem with every "#endif" line.
>>>>
>>>> Line 6584 of dispnew.c, which is this:
>>>>
>>>> #endif /* HAVE_WINDOW_SYSTEM */
>>>>
>>>> exhibits a slightly different incorrect behavior: "C-e RET" on that
>>>> line moves point to column 7, not column 6, presumably to align with
>>>> the "/*" of the comment?
>>>>
>>>> Line 6608 of dispnew.c is just "#else"; typing "C-e RET" there
>>>> unexpectedly goes to column 2 instead of 4.
>>>
>>> That’s indeed the “align to previous statement”’s fault, caused by preproc
>>> directives Theo was working on. I’ve fixed it. Theo, while working on this,
>>> I found some problem with the current indent for preproc directives. In the
>>> following example:
>>>
>>> static void
>>> free_glyph_pool (struct glyph_pool *pool)
>>> {
>>> if (pool)
>>> {
>>> #if defined GLYPH_DEBUG
>>> int c = 1;
>>> #endif
>>> int check_this = 3;
>>> #ifdef stuff
>>> int c = 1;
>>> #elif defined stuff
>>> int e = 5;
>>> #else
>>> int d = 11;
>>> #endif
>>> int check_this = 3;
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> The elif directive’s and subsequent directives aren’t indented properly.
>>> Looking at the parsed tree, the elif directives are nested in the if
>>> directive, and the nesting can be arbitrarily deep. We probably need a
>>> custom function rather than great-grand-parent to find the anchor, like a
>>> function that keeps going up the tree until the node isn’t a preproc
>>> directive anymore.
>>>
>>> Yuan
>>
>> Yeah, you're right. I'll see what I can do, but bandwidth is a little low at
>> the moment, so if you have some extra time, don't hesitate to improve it :)
>
>Absolutely, I’ll work on it.
>
>Yuan
Thanks :)
- bug#61893: 29.0.60; Indentation in c-ts-mode broken again, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/01
- bug#61893: 29.0.60; Indentation in c-ts-mode broken again, Theodor Thornhill, 2023/03/01
- bug#61893: 29.0.60; Indentation in c-ts-mode broken again, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/01
- bug#61893: 29.0.60; Indentation in c-ts-mode broken again, Daniel Martín, 2023/03/01
- bug#61893: 29.0.60; Indentation in c-ts-mode broken again, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/01
- bug#61893: 29.0.60; Indentation in c-ts-mode broken again, Yuan Fu, 2023/03/01
- bug#61893: 29.0.60; Indentation in c-ts-mode broken again, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/02
- bug#61893: 29.0.60; Indentation in c-ts-mode broken again, Yuan Fu, 2023/03/02
- bug#61893: 29.0.60; Indentation in c-ts-mode broken again, Theodor Thornhill, 2023/03/03
- bug#61893: 29.0.60; Indentation in c-ts-mode broken again, Yuan Fu, 2023/03/03
- bug#61893: 29.0.60; Indentation in c-ts-mode broken again,
Theodor Thornhill <=
- bug#61893: 29.0.60; Indentation in c-ts-mode broken again, Yuan Fu, 2023/03/04
- bug#61893: 29.0.60; Indentation in c-ts-mode broken again, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/05
- bug#61893: 29.0.60; Indentation in c-ts-mode broken again, Yuan Fu, 2023/03/05
- bug#61893: 29.0.60; Indentation in c-ts-mode broken again, Theodor Thornhill, 2023/03/06
- bug#61893: 29.0.60; Indentation in c-ts-mode broken again, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/06
- bug#61893: 29.0.60; Indentation in c-ts-mode broken again, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/06