|
From: | Matt Wittmann |
Subject: | bug#62065: 30.0.50; No prompt to confirm unsafe local variables when eglot-ensure used in major mode hook |
Date: | Sun, 19 Mar 2023 18:07:24 -0700 |
Matt Wittmann <mcwitt@gmail.com> writes:
>> Matt can you confirm this as well (both the error and the non-setting)?
>
> Confirmed both! (Sorry, I hadn't noticed the relevant message before.)
I've pushed a fix to emacs-29. The commit message (which I repeat at
the end of this email) explains the convoluted problem.
There is a follow up problem. If the user answer "no" to the prompt
which now correctly appears, that user will likely be prompted again
immediately afterwards.
That's because Eglot uses dir-locals, but only to get at the value of
'eglot-workspace-configuration'. This variable is usually automatically
safe and won't motivate the prompt, but other unsafe variables are also
"pulled in", and they motivate the prompt.
I don't know how to fix this effectively without enhancing the
dir-locals logic to allow for Eglot to ask to "pull in" just one
variable, eglot-workspace-configuration.
An attempt was made to bind noninteractive to true around Eglot's
hack-dir-local-variables. That means that there is never the second
prompt. Theoretically should allow eglot-workspace-configuration to
come through if it is safe, even if other variables beside it are
unsafe.
Except that it doesn't. Could this be an alternative?
So I'm at a loss here. The situation is better after the commit, but
this safety-related confusion, where eglot-workspace-configuration
somehow isn't set when neighbouring unsafe variables, can exist even
eglot-ensure _isn't_ used.
João
ommit b916ec88b2ffe22a49128f17cdfb78f0ab1bc713
Author: João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com>
Date: Sun Mar 12 18:19:40 2023 +0000
Make eglot-ensure's post-command-hook run a bit later (bug#62065)
'eglot-ensure', typically used in the major-mode-hook, use
'post-command-hook' to schedule an automated, non-interactive
connection attempt to a server. The goal is to connect when the
buffer is ready, i.e. after the user command that found the file.
However, if there are dir-local or buffer-local variables to confirm,
finding the file will cause a minibuffer prompt to appear.
In that case, 'eglot-ensure's addition to the global post-command-hook
runs before it was intended too and a connection is started
prematurely.
In turn, this means that a call to 'hack-dir-local-variables' -- which
is part of the connection process -- which also needs a minibuffer
prompt, collides with the previous one. This generates an error and
confuses the user, who doesn't know if the directory-local variables
have been applied or not.
This commit fixes the clash by having 'eglot-ensure' set
'post-command-hook' buffer-locally. This causes the automated
connection to take place, as intended, after the user's original
file-finding command has ended.
However, the problem reported in bug#62065 is not completely fixed.
If the user answers "no" to the first "confirm local variables"
"prompt, she will be prompted again in the second one. A subsequent
commit will address this separate problem.
* lisp/progmodes/eglot.el (eglot-ensure): Use buffer-local post-command-hook.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |