bug#62333: 30.0.50; Issue with tree-sitter syntax tree during certain changes

[Dmitry Gutov]

On 27/03/2023 01:52, Yuan Fu wrote:
> If we can pull it off, a user only need to specify what is a pair and how to 
> find the matching pair according to the language grammar, and the rest is 
> automatic (a tree-sitter function for show-paren-data-function and 
> blink-matching-paren).

Sounds good. Indeed, for this feature a registry of opener-closers 
should suffice.

Another command that could use it, is an implementation of 
backward-up-list. Somehow the default up-list manages to use SMIE's 
forward-sexp-function (and backward...) definitions automatically, but 
not tree-sitter's. I've been told it's expected for now, so I think 
opener-closers are the missing piece (either to enhance 
treesit-forward-sexp/treesit-backward-sexp to resemble the originals 
more closely, or to implement treesit-backward-up).