bug#63731: [PATCH] Support Emoji Variation Sequence 16 (FE0F) where appropriate

[Robert Pluim]

>>>>> On Thu, 01 Jun 2023 15:43:26 +0300, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> said:

    >> Cc: 63731@debbugs.gnu.org, steven@stebalien.com
    >> Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 19:18:22 +0300
    >> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
    >> 
    >> > From: Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com>
    >> > Cc: 63731@debbugs.gnu.org,  steven@stebalien.com
    >> > Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 18:11:36 +0200
    >> > 
    >> >     Eli> So there are two issues here: (a) why there's no composition 
in the
    >> >     Eli> first case, and (b) why does "C-u C-x =" says there is when 
there
    >> >     Eli> isn't.
    >> > 
    >> > OK. I can poke around in gdb if you give me some idea of what I should
    >> > be looking at.
    >> 
    >> I don't really know.  I plan to just step through the code in
    >> composite.c tomorrow, unless you beat me to it.  Once we understand
    >> issue (a), I think we will also understand issue (b).

    Eli> OK, the issue is quite clear even without stepping with a debugger.

    Eli> Bottom line: we cannot support a situation where the same character
    Eli> can be composed by more than one slot in composition-function-table.
    Eli> If there are more than a single slot for the same character, one of
    Eli> them will be tried, and the rest will be ignored (not even tried).
    Eli> In particular, if a character CH has a "forward" composition rule that
    Eli> starts with itself, and also has a "backward" rule (one with non-zero
    Eli> look-back parameter) triggered by a different character (which should
    Eli> follow CH), the latter rule will never be tried.

OK, that makes sense. Where would be a good place to document this?

    Eli> This is what happens in this case: the character #x1F44D has several
    Eli> rules that start with itself in emoji-zwj.el:

    Eli>   (#x1F44D .
    Eli>   ,(eval-when-compile (regexp-opt
    Eli>    '(
    Eli>    "\N{U+1F44D}\N{U+1F3FB}"
    Eli>    "\N{U+1F44D}\N{U+1F3FC}"
    Eli>    "\N{U+1F44D}\N{U+1F3FD}"
    Eli>    "\N{U+1F44D}\N{U+1F3FE}"
    Eli>    "\N{U+1F44D}\N{U+1F3FF}"
    Eli>    ))))

    Eli> and it also has a "backward" rule:

    Eli>   (set-char-table-range
    Eli>    composition-function-table
    Eli>    #xFE0F '(["\\c.\ufe0f" 1 font-shape-gstring]))

    Eli> The latter is triggered by #xFE0F and has a 1-character look-back,
    Eli> which will match #x1F44D, since its category is '.' (it's a "base
    Eli> character").  This latter rule is never tried.  Why? because the
    Eli> former rules, anchored at #X1F44D, are tried first (Emacs redisplay
    Eli> examines characters in the order of their buffer positions), and fail
    Eli> to match.  When those rules fail to match, due to how the
    Eli> composition-related functions called by the display engine are
    Eli> factored, we never again consider compositions triggered by a later
    Eli> character which "cover" also #x1F44D: once that position was examined
    Eli> and the attempted composition failed, we move to the next character.
    Eli> IOW, we assume that this first set of composition rules we find for a
    Eli> given character are the only ones that could possibly be relevant for
    Eli> that character.

    Eli> Which means that to have #xFE0F compose correctly with Emoji
    Eli> codepoints, we should include #xFE0F in the sequences in emoji-zwj.el.

Thatʼs easy enough:

diff --git a/admin/unidata/emoji-zwj.awk b/admin/unidata/emoji-zwj.awk
index 7d2ff6cb900..d1195ebbad8 100644
--- a/admin/unidata/emoji-zwj.awk
+++ b/admin/unidata/emoji-zwj.awk
@@ -106,7 +106,8 @@ END {
 
      for (elt in ch)
     {
-        printf("(#x%s .\n,(eval-when-compile (regexp-opt\n'(\n%s\n))))\n", 
elt, vec[elt])
+        entries = sprintf("%s\n\"\\N{U+%s}\\N{U+FE0F}\"", vec[elt], elt)
+        printf("(#x%s .\n,(eval-when-compile (regexp-opt\n'(\n%s\n))))\n", 
elt, entries)
     }
      print "))"
      print "  (set-char-table-range composition-function-table"

That makes all the VS-16 sequences in
admin/unidata/emoji-variation-sequences.txt display with the emoji
font for me.

    Eli> The reason why "C-u C-x =" lies to us saying there's a composition
    Eli> where really there isn't is because descr-text.el uses the
    Eli> find-composition primitive, whose implementation is parallel and
    Eli> separate from that of the display-engine routines, and is structured
    Eli> differently.  So find-composition does succeed to detect the second
    Eli> rule, the one triggered by #xFE0F, which the display engine ignores.
    Eli> I will think whether this can be fixed, to avoid such false positives,
    Eli> but if we accept that there can be only one set of composition rules
    Eli> for a character, then we basically invoked undefined behavior here,
    Eli> and we got what we deserved.

If find-composition DTRT, could we not use it in the display engine?

Robert
--