bug#63949: 30.0.50; `vc-print-log´ does not erase buffer when called from *vc-change-log* buffer, at least for CVS logs

[Dmitry Gutov]

On 16/06/2023 22:33, Jens Schmidt wrote:
> On 2023-06-10  19:23, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> > I'd also like to hear Dmitry's views on these issues.  He was until 
> > now silent in this discussion, AFAICT.
>
> @Dmitry: What's your view on these issues?  Just making the handling of
> VC parent buffer more documented and "more consistent", whatever that
> means, or do you prefer some particular direction?

Sorry, been busy. I'll make sure to read the thread and comment on the 
issue tomorrow.