bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#64164: 29.0.92; buffer-file-coding-system changes unexpectedly after


From: miranda kastemaa
Subject: bug#64164: 29.0.92; buffer-file-coding-system changes unexpectedly after saving
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2023 23:46:37 +0300


On 19 Jun 2023, at 19.55, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:

Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2023 12:57:39 +0300
From: miranda@pulusound.fi

i am trying to edit remote files on another macOS system, using Tramp's 
ssh: method. i am running `emacs -Q`.

when i open any file on this remote system, the initial value of 
`buffer-file-coding-system` is what i would expect, i.e. undecided-unix 
or utf-8-unix, depending on whether the file contains non-ASCII 
characters.

however, after saving the file, `buffer-file-coding-system` suddenly 
changes to utf-8-hfs-mac. any subsequent save then changes all the line 
endings to CR, which i have not actively used since 2001 or so... :-)

i can use `set-buffer-file-coding-system` to set utf-8-unix, but the 
problem then occurs again after the next save. other remotes (Linux 
systems) do not exhibit the issue.

Emacs 28.2 works as expected.

Does this happen only with editing remote files via Tramp, or does it
also happen when you edit local files on macOS?

only via Tramp.

If it only happens with Tramp, is it possible for you to login to that
other system and edit files there locally, in case this is triggered
by something specific to that system?

yes, i have just now tested the same build on the system in question. with local files, the issue does not occur. but if i use Tramp/ssh: to localhost, or to a third mac, i once again get the unexpected line ending change after saving.

on this system too, 28.2 works as expected.

i am using the build from https://emacsformacosx.com/builds

I don't know what that is.  Are you sure this uses the official
sources from the emacs-29.0.92 tarball?

i have not inspected the build process myself, but at https://emacsformacosx.com/about, the author writes:

The scripts I run basically just configure and build right from the GNU sourceā€”I don't add any patches or any extraneous lisp packages. I do include the old Carbon icon on the disk image because I like it better than the new Cocoa icon but it is not enabled by default.

Emacs is built on various versions of Mac OS X: 10.10 and 10.14 as of 2020-05-12 (64 bit only). All the binaries are combined into a single executable and a small Rust launcher chooses which binary to run based on the machine's OS and architecture.

Why not just use a fat binary? Because fat binaries can only hold 1 of each architecture and Emacs has multiple x86_64 architectures binaries.

Why are there multiple x86_64 binaries? Even though recent versions of Emacs contain runtime feature detection, there is an issue with some library dependencies.

best,
miranda

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]