[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#64290: “named-let” doc bug?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#64290: “named-let” doc bug? |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Jun 2023 18:43:03 +0300 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> Cc: Shynur Xie <one.last.kiss@outlook.com>, 64290@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2023 09:59:13 -0400
>
> >> The following code seems fine semantically and grammatically:
> >>
> >> ;; -*- lexical-binding: nil; -*-
> >> (named-let f ((n 1))
> >> (dotimes (i n)
> >> (f 0)))
> >>
> >> But it throws error.
> >>
> >> Perhaps we should clarify that “‘named-let’ works as expected only
> >> when ‘lexical-binding’ is enabled” in relevant doc?
> >
> > Stefan, any comments?
>
> That or adding a check in `named-let` and raise an error when applicable.
I went with the former on the release branch. I think raising an
error is only appropriate for the master branch, if we even think it's
a good idea.