bug#63949: 30.0.50; `vc-print-log´ does not erase buffer when called from *vc-change-log* buffer, at least for CVS logs

[Jens Schmidt]

On 2023-06-24  05:08, Dmitry Gutov wrote:

> And done.

Thanks.

> I'm attaching a patch which should work fine, though could be a tad 
> risky for 29.

I like the patch - I think it is more in line with what the function
does/seems to do originally.

> Jens (and possibly others), could you try it out?

And it works, too.  It covers my test cases.  I also tried to run some
tests with indirect buffers, and they came out as I would have expected
them to come out.

It would have been nice to have the opinion of the original author of
commit d494833d47968fcd97ba549654a259d6fb6c2eee on this, but he doesn't
seem to be active any longer.