[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#64154: 29.0.92; Provide additional details on GnuPG and EPA usage in
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#64154: 29.0.92; Provide additional details on GnuPG and EPA usage in epa.texi |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Jun 2023 08:54:06 +0300 |
> Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 23:10:41 +0200
> From: Jens Schmidt <jschmidt4gnu@vodafonemail.de>
> Cc: 64154@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> On 2023-06-18 19:32, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> Back from greener pastures, sorry for the delay.
>
> >> +@node GnuPG Pinentry
> >> +@chapter GnuPG Pinentry
> >
> > Pleased add an index entry for the subject of this chapter. In
> > general, it is a good idea to have an index entry for each
> > chapter/section/subsection naming is main subject.
>
> Problem here being that epa.texi has no concept index yet. Should I
> create one from the existing chapters/sections/subsections in a separate
> patch?
Yes, please. A manual that lacks Concept Index is not a good manual,
IMO. In fact, Concept Index should be the very first index in a
manual; there are some good manuals which have only that and nothing
else.
> And the next question is: Does this ("new documentation of existing
> features") qualify for Emacs 29?
Documentation improvements and fixes are always okay on the release
branch. (But please hurry, since I plan on releasing Emacs 29.1 soon,
barring any grave bugs that will be uncovered.)
Thanks.