[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#67249: 30.0.50; `same-frame` equivalent for `display-buffer-alist`
From: |
martin rudalics |
Subject: |
bug#67249: 30.0.50; `same-frame` equivalent for `display-buffer-alist` |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Dec 2023 18:13:51 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird |
> +@vindex pop-up-frames{, a buffer display action alist entry}
> +@item pop-up-frames
> +This value controls whether @code{display-buffer} may display buffers
I don't think that "value" is correct here.
> +by making new frames. It has the same meaning as the
Also you probably might want to recommend using an alist entry here:
‘pop-up-frames’
Instead of customizing this variable to ‘t’, customize
‘display-buffer-base-action’, for example, as follows:
(setopt
display-buffer-base-action
'((display-buffer-reuse-window display-buffer-pop-up-frame)
(reusable-frames . 0)))
martin
- bug#67249: 30.0.50; `same-frame` equivalent for `display-buffer-alist`, (continued)
- bug#67249: 30.0.50; `same-frame` equivalent for `display-buffer-alist`, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/12/10
- bug#67249: 30.0.50; `same-frame` equivalent for `display-buffer-alist`, Stefan Monnier, 2023/12/10
- bug#67249: 30.0.50; `same-frame` equivalent for `display-buffer-alist`,
martin rudalics <=
- bug#67249: 30.0.50; `same-frame` equivalent for `display-buffer-alist`, Stefan Monnier, 2023/12/11
- bug#67249: 30.0.50; `same-frame` equivalent for `display-buffer-alist`, Stefan Monnier, 2023/12/16