|
From: | Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: | bug#66117: 30.0.50; `find-buffer-visiting' is slow when opening large number of buffers |
Date: | Wed, 13 Dec 2023 01:47:59 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0 |
On 13/12/2023 01:43, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
Stefan Monnier<monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:E.g. company-dabbrev-code creates a dynamic binding for case-fold-search in one place and then calls a function (company-dabbrev--search) that iterates across all buffers with re-search-forward.BTW, that `company-dabbrev-code` function may not do what you expect in those buffers that have set `case-fold-search` buffer-locally.Yup. Steps to reproduce: 1. emacs -Q 2. M-: (setq-local case-fold-search nil) 3. C-x b <RET> (to*Messages*) 4. M-: (let ((case-fold-search t)) (with-current-buffer (get-buffer "*scratch*") (search-forward "CREATE"))) 5. Observe search failing If step (2) is omitted, search succeeds.
That's a good data point, but since I don't understand why anybody would make (or does make) case-fold-search buffer-local, I'm not going to hurry to fix those cases.
Although, I am not sure if I like that let-binding is not reliable for buffer-locals. It is simply confusing from the point of view of let usage; even if documented. I'd rather go for `let' becoming more consistent.
That sounds attractive (ignoring all buffer-locals when let-bound?), but I'm guessing there are enough valid use cases for this behavior.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |