[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#68244: hash-table improvements
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#68244: hash-table improvements |
Date: |
Sat, 06 Jan 2024 13:51:51 +0200 |
> From: Mattias Engdegård <mattias.engdegard@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2024 12:34:05 +0100
> Cc: 68244@debbugs.gnu.org,
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,
> Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
>
> Buffer memory is indeed treated differently and does not advance the GC clock
> as far as I can tell. Presumably the reasoning is that buffer size changes
> make a poor proxy for object deaths.
Buffer memory is usually allocated via mmap (nowadays, implicitly by
libc), which is why it is treated differently.
- bug#68244: hash-table improvements, (continued)
bug#68244: hash-table improvements, Stefan Kangas, 2024/01/09
bug#68244: hash-table improvements, Mattias Engdegård, 2024/01/05
- bug#68244: hash-table improvements, Dmitry Gutov, 2024/01/05
- bug#68244: hash-table improvements, Mattias Engdegård, 2024/01/06
- bug#68244: hash-table improvements,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#68244: hash-table improvements, Dmitry Gutov, 2024/01/06
- bug#68244: hash-table improvements, Stefan Monnier, 2024/01/07
- bug#68244: hash-table improvements, Dmitry, 2024/01/07
- bug#68244: hash-table improvements, Mattias Engdegård, 2024/01/07
- bug#68244: hash-table improvements, Stefan Monnier, 2024/01/07
- bug#68244: hash-table improvements, Mattias Engdegård, 2024/01/08
- bug#68244: hash-table improvements, Stefan Monnier, 2024/01/08
- bug#68244: hash-table improvements, Mattias Engdegård, 2024/01/09
- bug#68244: hash-table improvements, Mattias Engdegård, 2024/01/13
- bug#68244: hash-table improvements, Gerd Möllmann, 2024/01/14