Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 20:57:13 +0200
Cc:68246@debbugs.gnu.org,casouri@gmail.com,joaotavora@gmail.com
From: Dmitry Gutov<dmitry@gutov.dev>
Even if we call non-file-visiting buffers' contents "languages", I don't
think anyone will have a heart attack or something.
"No heart attack" is a poor criterion for good parameterization and
consistent terminology. Confusing terms will spread confusion and
bugs. There's no reason for us to settle for sub-optimal terminology.
E.g., for example, we have message-mode, but if we wanted to support
alternatives, we could call the base "email-message". Or for different
major modes to edit VC commit messages, we could call the language
"vc-log-message".
Those are not "languages", so let's not call them that.