[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#67810: 29.1; fonts use synthetic bold on Linux / pgtk
From: |
Tim Ruffing |
Subject: |
bug#67810: 29.1; fonts use synthetic bold on Linux / pgtk |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Jan 2024 16:50:34 +0100 |
On Thu, 2023-12-14 at 14:55 -0800, Stefan Kangas wrote:
>
> They should use .svg files, I think. See the branch scratch/icons
> for
> the basic approach.
Yeah, that's a very clean approach, of course, but it's restricted to
graphical displays. And consideration went into the current design
described in
https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/elisp/Icons.html
which says "Icons should also have a textual fallback." and which has
an example with "textual" symbols.
@Po Lu:
Independent of icons, I still think that overstriking is a bit
unexpected. (I mean, even Eli didn't know about it.) I see that a font
regex is too much, but do you think a simple boolean option would be a
good idea? Or do you think the current behavior should simply be
documented more prominently?
Tim
- bug#67810: 29.1; fonts use synthetic bold on Linux / pgtk,
Tim Ruffing <=
- bug#67810: 29.1; fonts use synthetic bold on Linux / pgtk, Po Lu, 2024/01/11
- bug#67810: 29.1; fonts use synthetic bold on Linux / pgtk, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/01/12
- bug#67810: 29.1; fonts use synthetic bold on Linux / pgtk, Po Lu, 2024/01/12
- bug#67810: 29.1; fonts use synthetic bold on Linux / pgtk, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/01/12
- bug#67810: 29.1; fonts use synthetic bold on Linux / pgtk, Po Lu, 2024/01/12
- bug#67810: 29.1; fonts use synthetic bold on Linux / pgtk, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/01/12
- bug#67810: 29.1; fonts use synthetic bold on Linux / pgtk, Po Lu, 2024/01/12
- bug#67810: 29.1; fonts use synthetic bold on Linux / pgtk, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/01/12
- bug#67810: 29.1; fonts use synthetic bold on Linux / pgtk, Po Lu, 2024/01/12
- bug#67810: 29.1; fonts use synthetic bold on Linux / pgtk, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/01/13