[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#68637: 30.0.50; image-dired-mark-tagged-files and ls -F
From: |
Manuel Giraud |
Subject: |
bug#68637: 30.0.50; image-dired-mark-tagged-files and ls -F |
Date: |
Sun, 21 Jan 2024 22:44:28 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
"Basil L. Contovounesios" via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army
knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org> writes:
[...]
> At first glance it looks like the
>
> (search-forward-regexp (format "\\s %s$" curr-file) nil t)
>
> in image-dired-mark-tagged-files doesn't take into account any of the
> indicators that 'ls -F' may append to file names.
Thanks for this insight. The following patch seems to do the trick. I
think we can limit ourselves to executable and symlink since I can't see
how directories, pipes, sockets or doors(?) could be regular image
files.
diff --git a/lisp/image/image-dired-dired.el b/lisp/image/image-dired-dired.el
index f4778d8e121..7219a106ca8 100644
--- a/lisp/image/image-dired-dired.el
+++ b/lisp/image/image-dired-dired.el
@@ -383,7 +383,7 @@ image-dired-mark-tagged-files
(file-name-directory curr-file)))
(setq curr-file (file-name-nondirectory curr-file))
(goto-char (point-min))
- (when (search-forward-regexp (format "\\s %s$" curr-file) nil t)
+ (when (search-forward-regexp (format "\\s %s[*@]?$" curr-file) nil t)
(setq hits (+ hits 1))
(dired-mark 1))))
(message "%d files with matching tag marked" hits)))
> The commentary suggests using dired-mark-files-regexp would be too slow.
> I wonder if that's still the case, or if there are any faster
> alternatives without loss of generality?
I did not try this alternative.
--
Manuel Giraud