[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#68445: [PATCH] Problem with python--treesit-syntax-propertize
From: |
kobarity |
Subject: |
bug#68445: [PATCH] Problem with python--treesit-syntax-propertize |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Jan 2024 23:14:42 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue) FLIM-LB/1.14.9 (Gojō) APEL-LB/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/30.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) |
Dmitry Gutov wrote:
>
> On 22/01/2024 17:44, kobarity wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Dmitry Gutov wrote:
> >> On 21/01/2024 16:47, kobarity wrote:
> >>> I am resending my mail, as I made a mistake in X-Debbugs-CC.
> >> Was it supposed to appear in the bug's thread? I don't see it anywhere.
> >
> > My first mail was registered as Bug#68445, and my patch is there.
> >
> > https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=68445
> >
> > It says:
> >
> > Report forwarded to casouri <at> gmail.com, dmitry@.gutov.dev,
> > bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
> >
> > The extra period is my mistake and it may have caused the problem.
> > I'm sorry for the confusion.
>
> Yeah, but even so that's odd: I'm subscribed to the bug tracker, so
> the email should have at least arrived in my inbox, but it did not.
I agree. I can't find my first mail in the bug-gnu-emacs archive.
> >> I think there is also another approach--handle two different types of
> >> nodes separately, instead of just string_content, so we don't have to
> >> start from the beginning of the literal. Like this:
> >>
> >> diff --git a/lisp/progmodes/python.el b/lisp/progmodes/python.el
> >> index e2f614f52c2..4f8b0cb9473 100644
> >> --- a/lisp/progmodes/python.el
> >> +++ b/lisp/progmodes/python.el
> >> @@ -1361,13 +1361,15 @@ python--treesit-syntax-propertize
> >> (while (re-search-forward (rx (or "\"\"\"" "'''")) end t)
> >> (let ((node (treesit-node-at (point))))
> >> ;; The triple quotes surround a non-empty string.
> >> - (when (equal (treesit-node-type node) "string_content")
> >> - (let ((start (treesit-node-start node))
> >> - (end (treesit-node-end node)))
> >> - (put-text-property (1- start) start
> >> - 'syntax-table (string-to-syntax "|"))
> >> - (put-text-property end (min (1+ end) (point-max))
> >> - 'syntax-table (string-to-syntax "|"))))))))
> >> + (cond
> >> + ((equal (treesit-node-type node) "string_content")
> >> + (put-text-property (1- (treesit-node-start node))
> >> + (treesit-node-start node)
> >> + 'syntax-table (string-to-syntax "|")))
> >> + ((and (equal (treesit-node-type node) "string_end")
> >> + (= (treesit-node-start node) (- (point) 3)))
> >> + (put-text-property (- (point) 3) (- (point) 2)
> >> + 'syntax-table (string-to-syntax "|"))))))))
> >>
> >>
> >> ;;; Indentation
> >>
> >
> > This approach seems better than my patch, but it does not seem to
> > address the following special case.
> >
> > #+begin_src python
> > """a""""""b"""
> > #+end_src
>
> All right, try the patch below, please. It also covers the case of the
> empty literal.
Thanks, it looks good to me.
> I've tried to find a case where it would behave poorly (e.g. by
> misdetecting three quotes from a combination of some other string
> literals), but couldn't. E.g.,
>
> s = '''asdasd'
>
> is not a concatenation. It's always an error, at least according to
> the TS grammar.
I think the TS grammar is correct, because this example is also an
error according to the Python interpreter.