[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#71934: comp--spill-lap-function and closure (wad: bug#71934: 31.0.50
From: |
Andrea Corallo |
Subject: |
bug#71934: comp--spill-lap-function and closure (wad: bug#71934: 31.0.50; edebug--called-interactively-skip vs. new fun objects) |
Date: |
Sat, 06 Jul 2024 03:48:50 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> writes:
> Hello, Stefan.
>
> On Fri, Jul 05, 2024 at 14:17:38 -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> > Not sure what you mean by "no such thing as a form ... like a closure".
>
>> A form that starts with `closure` is not a valid form because there is
>> no definition for `closure`: (fboundp 'closure) => nil.
>
>> > I bumped into one last summer.
>
>> > In particular (in my development repo fixing bug #64646) I put this into
>> > *scratch*:
>
>> > (defconst foo (lambda (baz) (car baz)))
>
>> > , evaluated it with C-x C-e and then M-: (native-compile foo). This
>> > threw the error "Cannot native-compile, form is not a lambda".
>
>> That error seems right according to the docstring:
>
>> (defun native-compile (function-or-file &optional output)
>> "Compile FUNCTION-OR-FILE into native code.
>> This is the synchronous entry-point for the Emacs Lisp native
>> compiler. FUNCTION-OR-FILE is a function symbol, a form, or the
>> filename of an Emacs Lisp source file. If OUTPUT is non-nil, use
>> it as the filename for the compiled object. If FUNCTION-OR-FILE
>> is a filename, if the compilation was successful return the
>> filename of the compiled object. If FUNCTION-OR-FILE is a
>> function symbol or a form, if the compilation was successful
>> return the compiled function."
>
>> (closure ...) is not a function symbol nor a valid form. Instead it's
>> a function value and the docstring doesn't say such are
>> a valid arguments to `native-compile`.
>
> All very clever arguments, no doubt, but in the end it means you cannot
> native compile foo. I've just tried it on emacs-30, and it doesn't work.
> But you could compile foo last summer after my fixes for bug #64646.
> Between last summer and now, something has gone badly wrong in Emacs's
> basic mechanisms.
(defconst foo (lambda (baz) (car baz)))
(native-compile #'foo)
Never worked AFAIR, the functionality you added was:
(defun foo () "foo doc string"
(lambda () "lambda doc string" 3))
(subr-native-elisp-p (funcall (native-compile 'foo)))
And this still works for me.
I'm probably missing something sorry.
Andrea
- bug#71934: comp--spill-lap-function and closure (wad: bug#71934: 31.0.50; edebug--called-interactively-skip vs. new fun objects), (continued)
- bug#71934: comp--spill-lap-function and closure (wad: bug#71934: 31.0.50; edebug--called-interactively-skip vs. new fun objects), Alan Mackenzie, 2024/07/06
- bug#71934: comp--spill-lap-function and closure (wad: bug#71934: 31.0.50; edebug--called-interactively-skip vs. new fun objects), Michael Heerdegen, 2024/07/07
- bug#71934: comp--spill-lap-function and closure (wad: bug#71934: 31.0.50; edebug--called-interactively-skip vs. new fun objects), Stefan Monnier, 2024/07/07
- bug#71934: comp--spill-lap-function and closure (wad: bug#71934: 31.0.50; edebug--called-interactively-skip vs. new fun objects), Andrea Corallo, 2024/07/08
- bug#71934: comp--spill-lap-function and closure (wad: bug#71934: 31.0.50; edebug--called-interactively-skip vs. new fun objects), Alan Mackenzie, 2024/07/08
- bug#71934: 31.0.50; edebug--called-interactively-skip vs. new fun objects, Michael Heerdegen, 2024/07/09
- bug#71934: comp--spill-lap-function and closure (wad: bug#71934: 31.0.50; edebug--called-interactively-skip vs. new fun objects),
Andrea Corallo <=
- bug#71934: comp--spill-lap-function and closure (wad: bug#71934: 31.0.50; edebug--called-interactively-skip vs. new fun objects), Alan Mackenzie, 2024/07/06
- bug#71934: comp--spill-lap-function and closure (wad: bug#71934: 31.0.50; edebug--called-interactively-skip vs. new fun objects), Andrea Corallo, 2024/07/06
- bug#71934: comp--spill-lap-function and closure (wad: bug#71934: 31.0.50; edebug--called-interactively-skip vs. new fun objects), Andrea Corallo, 2024/07/09
- bug#71934: comp--spill-lap-function and closure (wad: bug#71934: 31.0.50; edebug--called-interactively-skip vs. new fun objects), Alan Mackenzie, 2024/07/10
- bug#71934: comp--spill-lap-function and closure (wad: bug#71934: 31.0.50; edebug--called-interactively-skip vs. new fun objects), Andrea Corallo, 2024/07/10
- bug#71934: comp--spill-lap-function and closure (wad: bug#71934: 31.0.50; edebug--called-interactively-skip vs. new fun objects), Andrea Corallo, 2024/07/06