|
From: | Paul Eggert |
Subject: | bug#72145: rare Emacs screwups on x86 due to GCC bug 58416 |
Date: | Thu, 18 Jul 2024 05:38:26 -0700 |
User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird |
On 2024-07-17 20:22, Richard Stallman wrote:
> * Rewrite Emacs to never use 'double' (or 'float' or 'long double') > inside a union. This could be painful and hardly seems worthwhile. Where does Emacs use those types inside a union? Maybe this is not difficult.
I found the bug in src/timefns.c, which uses a union to represent timestamp forms (one of which represents an Emacs float). Other uses that come to mind are src/lisp.h's struct Lisp_Float, which uses a union to save space when representing Lisp floats, and src/lread.c's and src/print.c's use of <ieee754.h>'s unions to deal with NaNs when reading and printing Lisp floats. Although I have not done an audit I expect there are other places too, and I expect it would take some time to audit, rewrite and thoroughly test Emacs to not use floating point in these places, with runtime performance degraded somewhat as a result.
Although that effort might be worth it if the bug was likely and there was no other workaround, the bug is quite rare (we've lived with it for decades and I'm the first person to notice it, or at least track it down), and with the proposed compiler-flag workaround the remaining affected platforms are so obsolescent (decades-old CPUs) that they're also rare. I doubt whether it's worth significantly contorting the C code (possibly introducing bugs on mainstream platforms) to fix these exceedingly rare bugs in obsolescent platforms.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |