[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#72328: [PATCH] Nested backquote in pcase
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
bug#72328: [PATCH] Nested backquote in pcase |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Jul 2024 03:45:31 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
> Stefan, any comments?
FWIW, when I (re)implemented the Pcase backquote with `pcase-defmacro`
I hesitated between doing what Thuna suggests and what we have now.
I opted for the current behavior because it's simpler (at least from
the implementation's point of view), even though it
admittedly breaks the symmetry with the backquote macro.
I think I'd be interested to hear about "real life" cases out there
where this choice would make a difference (in either direction).
If we indent to change the behavior, I think we'd first need to introduce
a warning for patterns that would be affected by the change.
Stefan
- bug#72328: [PATCH] Nested backquote in pcase, Thuna, 2024/07/27
- bug#72328: [PATCH] Nested backquote in pcase, Michael Heerdegen, 2024/07/28
- bug#72328: [PATCH] Nested backquote in pcase, Thuna, 2024/07/29
- bug#72328: [PATCH] Nested backquote in pcase, Michael Heerdegen, 2024/07/29
- bug#72328: [PATCH] Nested backquote in pcase, Michael Heerdegen, 2024/07/29
- bug#72328: [PATCH] Nested backquote in pcase, Thuna, 2024/07/29
- bug#72328: [PATCH] Nested backquote in pcase, Michael Heerdegen, 2024/07/30