[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#74488: Why not modernize Emacs
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
bug#74488: Why not modernize Emacs |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Nov 2024 23:52:30 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
We don't seek to make Emacs "modern" in the sense changing things to
follow changing fashions. For instance, Lisp still has the advantages
it always had. Even if somene offered to rewrite all our existing
Lisp code into Python, we still prefer Lisp.
--
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- bug#74488: Why not modernize Emacs, Raj Divecha, 2024/11/22
- bug#74488: Why not modernize Emacs, Stefan Kangas, 2024/11/22
- bug#74488: Why not modernize Emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/11/23
- bug#74488: Why not modernize Emacs, Raj Divecha, 2024/11/25
- bug#74488: Why not modernize Emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/11/25
- bug#74488: Why not modernize Emacs, Eduardo Ochs, 2024/11/26
- bug#74488: Why not modernize Emacs, Raj Divecha, 2024/11/26
- bug#74488: Why not modernize Emacs, Eduardo Ochs, 2024/11/26
- bug#74488: Why not modernize Emacs, Raj Divecha, 2024/11/27
- bug#74488: Why not modernize Emacs,
Richard Stallman <=