[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#77421: [PATCH] [etags] Fix module definition with ::
|
From: |
Laurent Stacul |
|
Subject: |
bug#77421: [PATCH] [etags] Fix module definition with :: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 02 Apr 2025 15:55:09 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.12.8; emacs 31.0.50 |
Hello,
Thanks for your review.
> This might have not come up before because this convention is
> relatively less popular, but the proposed change should be an
> improvement.
I agree this is not popular and I would not recommend this form of
definition but some codebases use it.
I just wanted to raise awareness on the changes on the two files
CTAGS.good_crlf and CTAGS.good_update which look huge (I was expecting 3
lines changed as in the other files). What I did is described in my
update of the README but I am not sure I did the right thing.
Regards,
Laurent