> > WIP patch attached with a test and some few refinements we've
> talked about
> > in this dialog. I didn't alter tab-bar-mode to tab-bar-lines as
> Martin
> > suggested. You're the expert.
>
> We don't need a new unusable option, so please remove it and submit
> a new patch.
> Also please replace tab-bar-mode with tab-bar-lines like Martin
> suggested.
> Then everything should be good. Also it seems you forgot to remove
> window-dedicated-p in your previous patch.
>
> I'll work on that now. I'll remove
> 'window-delete-active-tabs-inhibit-delete-frame'. 'window-dedicated-p'
> condition now gone.
>
> Are you sure you don't want this to support the case where tab-bar-mode
> is active and tabs merely aren't visible?
>
> There's also 'tab-bar--tab-bar-lines-for-frame' if you think that's more
> appropriate.
'tab-bar--tab-bar-lines-for-frame' is used to set tab-bar-lines,
but you need only to get it.
> All tests pass unless I set tab-bar-show nil, and I still think this patch
> should work even if the tab-bar is hidden, but tab-bar-mode is enabled.
It's a different situation when you see tabs like in a web browser.
They have even an option "Ask before closing multiple tabs".
We could add a similar option instead of the above one,
with 3 possible values like
1. nil - don't ask and close all tabs
2. t - close only the current tab
3. 'ask - ask a confirmation
Hmm. Well Emacs isn't a web browser, but I hear you. I'll try out an option like that and see how it feels. I haven't looked deeply, but if we prompt inside window functions and there are state changes along the code path before the prompt that we can't undo if the user quits while prompted, I don't think we need that level of complexity. Maybe we can prompt before state changes using window-deletable-p output as an indication. Again, not looked that deeply yet.