[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
PSPP-BUG: [patch #5209] Proposed casefile changes
From: |
Ben Pfaff |
Subject: |
PSPP-BUG: [patch #5209] Proposed casefile changes |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Jul 2006 22:37:42 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.4) Gecko/20060406 Firefox/1.5.0.4 (Debian-1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.4-1) |
Update of patch #5209 (project pspp):
Assigned to: blp => jmd
_______________________________________________________
Follow-up Comment #5:
The second patch you posted is closer to what I had in mind, but I
still think there is room for improvement.
Some comments:
* Nitpick: I find "klass" annoying to look at. I know that certain
projects use that spelling a lot, but "class" works just fine in C.
If we want to convert PSPP to C++ then we have bigger problem in my
opinion. So let's just use "class".
* Many of the asserts are redundant with what is going to happen
anyway a few lines later, and they make the code harder to read.
* The casting-via-macros-that-invoke-functions-that-assert trick is
perhaps a little safer, but I don't think it's enough to be really
worth the extra obfuscation. After all, the functions that call
these have generally been invoked through a function pointer via the
very same structure that they're checking. The kind of problem that
would cause an assertion failure here but not a bad jump is pretty
unlikely in my opinion.
* We can initialize the classes at compile time and make them const,
and there's not really a good reason to embed them with a separate
"initialised" member in an outer structure if we do that.
This is all kind of abstract, and I really hope I don't sound like
some kind of a jerk saying it. Anyhow, I implemented these changes in
casefile.c and fastfile.c and attached a patch illustrating them.
flexfile.c would want similar changes but I only did the minimum
necessary there.
_______________________________________________________
Additional Item Attachment:
File name: alternative.patch Size:108 KB
proposed change
<http://savannah.gnu.org/patch/download.php?file_id=10341>
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?func=detailitem&item_id=5209>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
- PSPP-BUG: [patch #5209] Proposed casefile changes, John Darrington, 2006/07/11
- PSPP-BUG: [patch #5209] Proposed casefile changes, Ben Pfaff, 2006/07/11
- PSPP-BUG: [patch #5209] Proposed casefile changes,
Ben Pfaff <=
- PSPP-BUG: [patch #5209] Proposed casefile changes, John Darrington, 2006/07/13
- PSPP-BUG: [patch #5209] Proposed casefile changes, John Darrington, 2006/07/14
- PSPP-BUG: [patch #5209] Proposed casefile changes, Ben Pfaff, 2006/07/14
- PSPP-BUG: [patch #5209] Proposed casefile changes, John Darrington, 2006/07/15
- PSPP-BUG: [patch #5209] Proposed casefile changes, Ben Pfaff, 2006/07/16
- PSPP-BUG: [patch #5209] Proposed casefile changes, John Darrington, 2006/07/16
- PSPP-BUG: [patch #5209] Proposed casefile changes, Ben Pfaff, 2006/07/17
- PSPP-BUG: [patch #5209] Proposed casefile changes, John Darrington, 2006/07/17