[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
PSPP-BUG: [bug #46727] REGRESSION subcommand SAVE does not honor filter
From: |
Ben Pfaff |
Subject: |
PSPP-BUG: [bug #46727] REGRESSION subcommand SAVE does not honor filter variables |
Date: |
Sun, 03 Jan 2016 06:23:29 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/31.0 Iceweasel/31.2.0 |
Update of bug #46727 (project pspp):
Summary: Filter variable is not workign for regression!!! =>
REGRESSION subcommand SAVE does not honor filter variables
_______________________________________________________
Follow-up Comment #4:
Elias, I can confirm that filters are ignored. Before we can change that, we
need to define the desired behavior for the filtered cases. Should the new
variables be system-missing for the filtered cases? Or should the new
variables be calculated as they are for other cases, even though their values
did not participate in calculating the regression parameters?
John, I don't think this is related to bug #44877 (which I know I said I'd
fix; I still plan to).
For the moment, I'll aim to add a warning if FILTER is present when REGRESSION
with a SAVE subcommand is processed.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?46727>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
- PSPP-BUG: [bug #46727] REGRESSION subcommand SAVE does not honor filter variables,
Ben Pfaff <=