Trauma Response E-News

A Perspective on Preventing School Violence

by Mark D. Lerner, Ph.D.
President, AAETS

Not long ago the most severe problems encountered in our schools were students running in the halls, making excessive noise, cutting a line, talking out-of-turn, chewing gum or violating a dress code.

Today, we are faced with an increase in violence including assaults and gang activity. We are seeing an increase in the frequency of substance abuse, self-mutilation, suicide, abandonment of newborn babies, and serious injuries and deaths from automobile accidents. We are also contending with new types of violence including terrorist attacks, hostage-taking, snipers, murders, "hit lists," threatening graffiti, bomb scares and real bombs.

The tragedy at Red Lake High School in Minnesota is a painful reminder of what can happen in a school. Following, is my perspective on how we may prevent school violence.

What are the causes of school-based violence?

A wide spectrum of traumatic events are impacting our nation's schools. And, as a consequence, our school systems are being charged with the responsibility of responding to school-based crises. In recent years, school districts have been scrambling to develop comprehensive crisis response plans. We no longer question if a school will be faced with a tragedy, but when.

Many factors contribute to the causes of school violence. Research is helping us to understand the relationship between violent television programs, movies, music lyrics and violent behavior. Additionally, the interactive nature of violent computer and video games is being investigated.

We hear about the availability of guns and other weapons and we cannot ignore the data. During the last decade, nearly 80% of all violent deaths in schools were caused by guns (The Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence).

There is a dramatic increase in alcohol and substance use among our children, peer pressure and gang involvement. We are learning about children who are tormented and teased, and then go on to harm themselves and others. We are seeing the effects of divorce, "latchkey kids," parents working long hours and an absence of parental supervision, training and example-setting. Today, there are relaxed curfews, a lack of respect for authority and a lack of family involvement with schools. There is a changing family structure as well - with a large number of single parent families, grandparents and extended family living in the home.

Today, there is a growing trend of violence related to race and/or religion. This is particularly disturbing in light of the fact that diversity in America is rapidly increasing. The extent to which these variables are related to the quantitative and qualitative changes in violent school-based crises will become more apparent with time and with further empirical investigation.

The inevitability of illness, accidents and loss may be accepted and even anticipated by schools that often view themselves as microcosms of our world. But why is there such a dramatic increase in deliberately-caused tragedies - those of intentional human design?

At the very core of our problem is a fundamental communication breakdown in families - the result, in large part, of an increasingly digital and mechanized world. We are spending less time communicating, teaching and modeling appropriate behavior with our children—we are losing the battle to the proliferation of electronic media in a rapidly changing, mechanized world (Lerner, 1999).

At the breakfast table, printed and televised media offer a daily dose of violence. Today, our children leave or avoid the dinner table or family room, opting for the new era in violent television, video and computer games, and Internet chat rooms. We used to know where our children went when they left our homes. Today, we don't know where they are when they are in their bedrooms.

Our children lack interpersonal communication, coping and problem-solving skills to meet the challenges of our new world - one reason why an increasing number of them act-out feelings of anger and frustration in dangerous attention-seeking ways, "self-medicate" with alcohol and other substances, and commit suicide at a higher rate than ever before.

How can we prevent school violence?

Today, our school systems are investing in expanded security forces, the installation of metal detectors and surveillance cameras, hand-held communication devices, "panic buttons," and computer "fire walls." Safety audits are becoming standard operating procedure. Although there are certainly benefits gained from taking these mechanical steps, we must address the root of the problem.

We need to help our children and adolescents to develop and enhance their communication and problem-solving skills. We must teach them how to actively listen and to empathize when relating with others. We must help our children to understand the importance of articulating their feelings about themselves and for others, and to know that it is okay to err on the side of caution when expressing concerns about others. We must regularly remind them that they can turn to their parents and/or school support personnel who will take the time to listen and respond to them. We must invest in the development of people skills (Lerner, 1999).

Far too often our children hear of disturbing ideation or plans prior to a tragedy and they do not know how to respond. It is not until the aftermath of a disaster that we see survivors interviewed and we hear them describe how the perpetrator had, in some way, suggested impending doom. In cases of adolescent suicide, more than 80% of kids who commit suicide tell someone, in some way, that they are going to end their life. Our children do not know what to do or where to turn with critical information.

We must work toward improving communication, through a multimodal approach, in order to prevent violent school tragedies. We can address emotional, cognitive, social, behavioral and physiological factors. For instance, we can help our children and adolescents to identify physiological changes in their bodies, which may precede or coincide with feelings of frustration and anger. We can help them to understand which of their behaviors/actions cause others to become frustrated and angry. We can teach them to become aware of and to identify negative self-statements - cognitions that generate feelings of frustration and anger. And, we can help our children to learn to replace self-defeating statements with positive coping statements. Behaviorally, we can model and espouse appropriate moral behavior, set limits and be consistent with our behavior. Ultimately, we can teach our children to show compassion and sincerity in relating with others.

We must help our children to understand that conflict is a natural part of interpersonal relationships. When we handle conflict well, it presents an opportunity to learn, to better understand ourselves and to generate creative solutions. When we handle conflict poorly, it can lead to violence.

We must help our children to make more adaptive, goal-directed decisions when faced with feelings of frustration. For example, we can teach them that it is okay to walk away from altercations or to take a few moments to "cool down." We can teach our children to express themselves assertively, to implement relaxation techniques, and to utilize conflict resolution and peer mediation skills. Interestingly, when we ask children and adolescents what they believe may help to reduce the frequency of school-based tragedies, they indicate that there needs to be more constructive opportunities for _expression_ of feelings. On the other hand, we must keep in mind that conflict resolution techniques and peer mediation programs presuppose conflict.

How can we prevent school violence? We must reach our children when they are very young and invest in developing communication and problem-solving skills.

Today, we must view all members of the school family as being "at risk" and become aware of the "early warning signs" to identify individuals who may be at greater risk for engaging in violent behavior (see http://www.crisisinfo.org/schooldownload.htm). Let us all become hypervigilant, learn to err on the side of caution, and work toward preventing violent tragedies in our schools.

From Dr. Lerner's column at www.crisisinfo.org.

Final Thoughts

In the wake of the tragedy at Red Lake High School in Minnesota, our heartfelt sympathy goes out to the countless survivors touched by this senseless act. This crisis is a painful reminder to all of us that it is not a matter of if a school will have to respond to a school-base tragedy, but when.

How would you respond? Are you prepared to look beyond the physical and safety needs of the school family and address emergent psychological needs? Will you be able to keep people functioning and mitigate long-term emotional suffering?

With the changing spirit of our times, school districts across our nation have been charged with the responsibility of developing comprehensive school crisis response plans. These plans typically focus on the structure of crisis response - in the after-math of a

tragedy. For example, they address such issues has who will serve as members of a school crisis response team? What are the specific roles of team members? And, how will information be shared with the school family?

Although these structured plans have been developed and implemented by school districts, little attention has been given to the process of school crisis response. For example, once students have been assembled in a lounge, library or other counseling venue, what is done to help them? What is the goal of early intervention? How do we handle the "raw emotion?" Who is truly prepared to address emergent psychological needs?

A Practical Guide for Crisis Response in Our Schools (http://www.crisisinfo.org/schoolindex.html) provides a structure and process for effectively managing the wide spectrum of school-based crises - from the seemingly mundane to the most severe. School crisis response can no longer be delegated solely to school administrators and members of a school crisis response team. Effective crisis management is the responsibility of all educators.

This guide incorporates a practical and effective strategy for addressing the emotional needs of people during traumatic events, Acute Traumatic Stress Management (http://www.crisisinfo.org/atsmindex.html). ATSM does not require caregivers to be mental health practitioners. Rather, ATSM can empower all educators by providing a "road map" to keep people functioning and lessen the likelihood of long-term emotional suffering.

Let us, once again, learn from the painful presence of a crisis and seize this opportunity to prepare and equip all members of our school family.

For further information about A Practical Guide for Crisis Response in Our Schools, including free downloadable documents, visit http://www.crisisinfo.org/schoolindex.html.

From:	American Academy of Experts in Traumatic Stress
Subject:	Trauma Response E-News
Date:	Tue, 5 Apr 2005 21:05:59 -0500