Re: More fixes for arm-epoc-pe binutils

[Tomas Hurka]

Hi Nick,
Thank you very much for your reply.

Nick Clifton  wrote at  Thu, 14 Dec 2000 :

> First of all, my apologise for taking so long to reply this patch
> submission.
You don't need to apologize. BTW: Did you read my first submission from Thu,  9 
Nov  
2000? Any comments to it?

> Unfortunately I cannot accept it as it,
Since it is my first submission, I did not expect to be accepted as was. I will 
 
gladly accept any changes to my submission from someone more experienced.

> as it is making a global
> change to the BFD library.  coffcode.h is used by lots of targets, not
> just the arm-epoc-pe target.
Yes, I know. I think thaTomast this patch can be useful for other platforms, 
which  
uses COFF format, but I am not sure. I will try to investigate it tomorrow. Do 
you  
know, that there is at least one COFF based platform, where disassemble option 
in  
objdump works correctly?

> Instead I would suggest that you add the
> extra flags to a definition of EXTRA_S_FLAGS for the arm-epoc-pe
> target, like this:
>
[...]
>
> Please could you try this patch out on your system and let me know if
> it works for you.
Sure.  I will check it tomorrow.

> One other point - when you do make patch submissions, please include
> an example ChangeLog entry as well
OK, I will.

Once again thank you very much for your comments.

Bye,
---
Tomas Hurka
address@hidden
NeXTMAIL and MIME OK