[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ls default time style
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: ls default time style |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Dec 2001 15:05:26 +0100 (CET) |
Miles Bader writes:
> > What I'm asking for is that this info be taken
> > into account by default and not overridden by a US centric notation.
>
> I don't know where you got the idea that this is a `US centric notation';
> I'm american, and I've certainly never seen it before.
Apologies. I was under the impression that the new behaviour Paul
Eggert introduced in "ls" would represent US habits. I stand
corrected.
Bruno
- ls default time style, Bruno Haible, 2001/12/10
- Re: ls default time style, Paul Eggert, 2001/12/10
- Re: ls default time style, Markus Kuhn, 2001/12/10
- Re: ls default time style, Bruno Haible, 2001/12/11
- Re: ls default time style, Hans-Bernhard Broeker, 2001/12/11
- Re: ls default time style, Markus Kuhn, 2001/12/11
- Re: ls default time style, Bruno Haible, 2001/12/11
- Re: ls default time style, Miles Bader, 2001/12/11
- Re: ls default time style,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: ls default time style, Markus Kuhn, 2001/12/11
- Re: ls default time style, Andreas Schwab, 2001/12/11
- Re: ls default time style, Markus Kuhn, 2001/12/11
- Re: ls default time style, Andreas Schwab, 2001/12/11
- Re: ls default time style, Markus Kuhn, 2001/12/11
- Re: ls default time style, Andreas Schwab, 2001/12/11
- Re: ls default time style, Paul Eggert, 2001/12/11
- Re: ls default time style, Paul Eggert, 2001/12/11
- Re: ls default time style, Paul Eggert, 2001/12/11
- Re: ls default time style, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/12/11