[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ls default time style
From: |
Markus Kuhn |
Subject: |
Re: ls default time style |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Dec 2001 19:01:51 +0000 |
Paul Jarc wrote on 2001-12-11 18:58 UTC:
> Emacs would parse the information out of the POSIX format, and then
> format it for the current locale just as ls would have. Other
> options: call ls twice, once in the current locale, for display, and
> once in POSIX, for parsing; or scrap ls and use directory-files and
> file-attributes.
Calling ls TWICE? Why does Emacs have to call "ls" AT ALL? Why not use
the relevant POSIX.1 API calls for reading directories?
Markus
--
Markus G. Kuhn, Computer Laboratory, University of Cambridge, UK
Email: mkuhn at acm.org, WWW: <http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/>
- Re: ls default time style, (continued)
- Re: ls default time style, Andreas Schwab, 2001/12/11
- Re: ls default time style, Paul Eggert, 2001/12/11
- Re: ls default time style, Paul Eggert, 2001/12/11
- Re: ls default time style, Paul Eggert, 2001/12/11
- Re: ls default time style, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/12/11
- Re: ls default time style, Bruno Haible, 2001/12/11
- Re: ls default time style, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/12/11
- Re: ls default time style, Paul Jarc, 2001/12/11
- Re: ls default time style, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/12/11
- Re: ls default time style, Paul Jarc, 2001/12/11
- Re: ls default time style,
Markus Kuhn <=
- Re: ls default time style, Paul Jarc, 2001/12/11
- Re: ls default time style, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/12/12
- Re: ls default time style, Paul Jarc, 2001/12/12
- Re: ls default time style, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/12/12
- Re: ls default time style, Paul Jarc, 2001/12/12
- Re: ls default time style, Paul Eggert, 2001/12/11
- Re: ls default time style, Bruno Haible, 2001/12/11
- Re: ls default time style, Paul Eggert, 2001/12/11
- Re: ls default time style, Andreas Schwab, 2001/12/12