[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: problem with egrep and fgrep
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
Subject: |
Re: problem with egrep and fgrep |
Date: |
Wed, 01 Sep 2004 20:51:01 GMT |
Hi Hans-Bernhard,
> > A thought I just had is that when the install is done why can't you
> > put the full path into the wrappers?
>
> Because hardwired paths just as easy to break, both on purpose and
> accidentally, as the PATH search method which you stumbled over.
That doesn't ring true. Certainly, after `make install', it isn't
expected that a package will work other than where it has been
installed, unless something like GNU Stow is used to patch things up, so
there seems little reason why the egrep script can't hardcode grep's
location.
Cheers,
--
Ralph Corderoy. http://inputplus.co.uk/ralph/ http://troff.org/
Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: problem with egrep and fgrep,
Ralph Corderoy <=
- Re: problem with egrep and fgrep, Bob Proulx, 2004/09/03
- Message not available
- Re: problem with egrep and fgrep, Ralph Corderoy, 2004/09/07
- Re: problem with egrep and fgrep, Bob Proulx, 2004/09/12
- Re: problem with egrep and fgrep, Paul Jarc, 2004/09/13
- Re: problem with egrep and fgrep, Bob Proulx, 2004/09/13
- Re: problem with egrep and fgrep, Paul Jarc, 2004/09/13
- Re: problem with egrep and fgrep, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/09/13
- Message not available
- Re: problem with egrep and fgrep, Eric Backus, 2004/09/13
- Re: problem with egrep and fgrep, Bob Proulx, 2004/09/15
- Message not available
- Re: problem with egrep and fgrep, Eric Backus, 2004/09/15